A Program to End Your “Addiction” of Voting for Candidates in the Two Party Duopoly!

Great post about not voting!

PROGRESSIVE ACTIVISTS VOICE

This program is designed to build  groups to critically discuss the advantages (and disadvantages) of an Election Boycott as a tactic to attack the two party Duopoly which totally controls our national elections.  It is primarily intended for federal elections including those for Congress and the Presidency. But it may also apply to many states as well.  We MUST break this incredibly destructive “habit” which many people feel they are “forced” to continue and, therefore, begin the process of destroying the Duopoly. (***Note:  Use of the term “addiction” is discussed briefly at the end.)

einstein-image-on-insanity

 

  1. Admit to yourself and others that the political system today is totally corrupted by Corporate Control which dominates the two political parties.
  2. Admit to yourself and others that those same corporations and the wealthy elite control the electoral process and the elected officials whom they elect. (Over 90% of incumbents are re-elected and the same…

View original post 400 more words

Why we should question what we were told about 9/11 !

9/11 Truth

PROGRESSIVE ACTIVISTS VOICE

Compiled by Thomas Baldwin, 9/11/2015

Included in this blog are two very important recent posts about the nature of damage done to buildings in NYC from the 9/11 attacks in 2001.  Architechs and Engineers for 9/11 have provided an excellent film showing evidence that Building 7 was demolished from explosions planted to implode the building.  These are competent professionals who are not promoting a conspiracy but explaining that we were not told the truth by our government!

Published on Feb 24, 2015

This is the original video that YouTube took down, without notice, on or about Feb 20, 2015 – which left the following notice for those who follow one of thousands of locations of the YouTube link out there on the internet:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature… Embedded below.

“This video has been removed as a violation of YouTube’s policy against spam, scams, and commercially deceptive content”

Which makes no sense whatsoever given…

View original post 720 more words